Wednesday, August 26, 2009 - 11:48 AM
Finally, a book review in The National Interest offers a balanced treatment of China's cyberwarfare capabilities, a rarity for American mainstream media these days:
Beijing is also developing cyber-warfare techniques, but exaggerated assessments of this capability fail to evaluate China’s own emerging vulnerability to such attacks. Cyber-warfare technologies and skills are readily accessible and U.S. advanced munitions are increasingly dependent on high-technology communication and surveillance technologies. The United States is thus vulnerable to cyber attacks, and a Chinese cyber offensive against the United States could influence U.S. operations in the western Pacific. Nonetheless, the reciprocal effect of Washington’s cyber-warfare capability on Beijing’s ability to wage high-technology warfare is equally significant.
The same advanced Chinese technologies and weaponry that pessimists argue present a major threat to U.S. security, including ASBMs, are highly dependent on advanced communication and surveillance technologies that are particularly vulnerable to U.S. cyber attacks. And once the United States degrades the PLA’s advanced communication technologies, China would lose its high-technology asymmetric capability that so alarms America’s pessimists, and it would be very susceptible to a wide range of superior U.S. sea-based forces, even if the United States suffered from an effective Chinese cyber attack.
Ouch, cyber-warfare could actually make the Chinese military more vulnerable; that memo must have got lost on its way to DC. This is not the cyber-warfare of botnets, but nevertheless, it's an important perspective that is not being heard in the current debates.
Of course, another overlooked benefit of cyberwarfare -- that is also rarely reported in the media -- is that it's, well, less bloody and thus more humane than conventional warfare. Why bomb train depots and thus risk civilian casualities if one could can temporarily disable their communication systems?
That's a great segue into Marcus Ranum's argument that "cyberwarfare is bulls**t" and that cyberwarfare option is only going to benefit those who are likely to win anyway.
Here is a video presentation of Ranum's contrarian thought that is worth watching.
The question for me isn't 'could the U.S attack China in this manner?', it's 'who would have the advantage?'. To date there has been no large scale cyberwar (that we know of) so no-one really knows which states should be considered big in this area of war. Much like robotics, this is unknown territory for law and combat.
We have seen war on land, water and air. This is a new war style of technology using cyber space. In technology US is way ahead of China. At the most what China can do is to create some virus or hack the system. Nothing to worry from China war threat.
Evgeny Morozov, originally from Belarus, is a visiting scholar at Stanford and a Schwartz Fellow at the New America Foundation.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE