Wednesday, September 30, 2009 - 2:56 PM
That RuNet has become the extension of TV/mass-culture is only part of the problem. Even worse..RuNet doesn't perform the civic and social functions that it does in other countries (EM: I wonder what kind of "functions" in "other countries" he has in mind - I am not sure that the Internet subcultures in America or Western Europe are any less a slave to infotainment and pornography - or did he mean China?)
It was expected that the Internet would help crystallize and mobilize parts of the civil society that are interested in a broad sweep of constructive reforms. Unfortunately, this hasn't happened yet. Sites of NGOs - including those of human rights organizations that defend the interests of the population - recieve less than 1% of the Russian Internet traffic (EM: Mironov's language makes it obvious that Kremlin is increasingly eager to use the rhetoric of its Western critics: civil society? NGOs? human rights? I think it signifies that a decade-long experiment to create fake Russian society - fronted by the quasi-state entities like the Public Chamber - has succeeded. It would be curious to see Kremlin encourage more interest to the web-sites of human rights organizations - how about an aggressive SEO campaign?)
"Instead [of becoming a base for the civil society], RuNet has become home to various antisocial and criminal elements. Porn sites, sites of drug addicts, sadists, pedophiles, sites of totalitarian sects, sites of extremist, racists, and nationalist organizations. And now, after casinos and betting houses have been expelled from our cities, numerous betting sites have sprung up. All these people must feel the hand of the government Internet censorship. These censorship efforts should be very selective, very responsible, and very careful. And they should follow the deliberations of the national consultative body that would be comprised of the leading Internet personalities and bloggers. This new consultative body should develop a set of rules guiding "tolerant online behavior" that would help to extirpate all virtual confrontation. It shouldn't contain any hints at political censorship but aim to help RuNet understand and imbibe the basic social functions of the state and the civil society" EM: in short, what Mironov is proposing is to create another fake civil society entity - the Bloggers Chamber - that will then decide how to limit the activities of the real virtual civil society, all with the purpose of teaching it "basic social functions of civil society"...
And your oposition is to what exactly?
According to Wikileaks just about every Western democracy has blacklists - officially or unofficially, and France has HADOPI - which involves NSA type spying on every single internet user.
Every single country in the world brings internet law in harmony with national law -
hate speech
terrorism
obscenity
I guess you gotta make a living right? Taking pot-shots at the easy targets: Russia, China, etc.
How about a nice review of hosting laws in America? Now that requires real research.
I think that a scholar named Eugeny Morozov is entitled to be somewhat interested in Russia. Additionally, his concern with Russian culture and the Russian Internet doesn't keep other people from researching other countries'. You sound pretty knowledgeable on the subject; why not establish a blog or news site on Internet censorship yourself?
And no, I don't mean that as sarcasm; Russia has certainly proven itself worth watching, but the democracies are, as well.
Evgeny Morozov, originally from Belarus, is a Yahoo! Fellow at the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy at Georgetown University.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE