Wednesday, November 4, 2009 - 2:11 PM
We discovered that the service which had initially been developed to mirror the blogosphere has become an amplifier, a media tool of sorts. It started exhibiting the effect of positive feedback: many bloggers were writing, commenting, and generating links only for the purposes of "pushing stuff into our top list". There appeared dedicated blog-bots, which were polluting the blogosphere with the same purpose: get into the list of most popular posts. To filter out the robots is a difficult but clear problem; we solved it. But what to do with the "social manipulation"? Particularly, when someone starts shouting "let's get this into the Yandex Top" and bloggers start linking to a given post? We thought it was a natural activity of Internet users and didn't put any hurdles when such items were getting into the top. We only put up a disclaimer: be careful, someone may be manipulating the links.
But more and more our service looks less than a mirror of the blogosphere and more as a tool of getting stuff "into the top" and then letting it spread through mass-media. Almost anyone who is not too lazy is using this tool: from people organizing fund-raising campaigns to all sorts of radicals. As a result, radicals of one variety started accusing Yandex of helping their enemies and vice verca. Journalists have also acquired a habit of checking our rating; getting stuff up there has become a paid service; and some people in power already treat it as "voice of the people".
The German blog aggregator Rivva has had a quite similar problem. They found a solution that seems to be working quite well:
Rivva aggregates articles that have been heavily linked to by blogs. To prohibit fraud, they have a database of blogs - only links from these count for Rivva's ranking. To get into this database, a blog need to be "endorsed" - linked to - by another one that's already in.
This way, it is hard to misuse Rivva to publicize extremist views or for marketing purposes. I think the system takes into account the usual viral spreading of news on the web very well, building on its most prevalent currency: Trust.
How is this the death of the networked public sphere?
It would seem this is actually the re-invigoration of the networked public sphere (or at least the genuine one).
I don't know the specifics of the algorithm, but even if it didn't pick up the most popular stories, instead finding ones with "high acceleration" (ten links in five minutes), it would seem those were destined for popularity, nonetheless.
Further, perhaps it is better to have a decentralization of power, especially in a country that is adept at silencing/co-opting loud voices. From the success of Yandex, there is definitely an incentive for people to create a successful new aggregator, but although I share Sunstein's concerns about echo chambers, I'm not convinced fragmented aggregators are necessarily the reason we're all going to be uber-polarized partisans.
well, I disagree. Yandex Blogs has accumulated so much power that it was serving as a very powerful media in the country, putting stories that mainstream media wouldn't touch into the spotlight. There is no such thing as "destined for popularity" in the Russian media space: that 20 blogs are talking about a subject doesn't mean anything - these discussions will still not be picked up by the vast majority of journalists who can then package this for consumption by the rest of the population. Now, breaking up that power will surely erode the journos' capacity to find & amplify these stories. Of course, it's possible that someone will come up with an aggregator that will lure the entire Yandex audiences - and some talented people are already working on it - but I am skeptical. and notice I didn't mention polarization anywhere in that piece; that's not what I am concerned about. My problem is that it would essentially become very hard to find shortcuts of getting into the national conversation (and yes, I do think that it's okay that many nationalists and extremists were taking advantage of those shortcuts too)
I am obviously relying on your familiarity with the Russian mediascape b/c mine consists of close to nada.
But, I'm still more optimistic that journalists doing there job of seeking out the best stories will be able to do so.
And perhaps because it is slightly more difficult to track for journos, it will be more difficult for the government. After all, a public sphere is supposed to exist outside the control of the government and decentralization aids that (i.e. less chilling effect).
for the record, Google Blogs doesn't do rating of blogs and cannot be an equivalent of Yandex Blogs.
Evgeny Morozov, originally from Belarus, is a visiting scholar at Stanford and a Schwartz Fellow at the New America Foundation.
Read More
(5)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE